How Critical Minerals Fuel the Green Revolution

In our latest episode of GreenTech Pulse, we speak with Greg Beischer, CEO of Alaska Energy Metals, about the essential role of critical minerals in the clean energy transition and the unexpected challenges they present.

The global push toward clean energy technologies and electric vehicles has created unprecedented demand for specific minerals – but this “green revolution” hides a paradox that few consumers understand. While we celebrate zero-emission vehicles and solar power installations, the critical minerals required to build them often come with significant environmental and geopolitical costs.

What Are Critical Minerals?

Critical minerals are materials deemed essential for economic and national security that face supply chain vulnerabilities. For clean energy applications, nickel and cobalt stand out as particularly crucial components.

“In the case of metals that are used for electrification, they’re crucial,” explains Greg Beischer, CEO of Alaska Energy Metals. “If we’re going to electrify our society, that means transmitting and storing a lot of electrical power, and that’s done with metals.”

These minerals aren’t just important – they’re foundational to the performance of clean technologies. For example, nickel plays a vital role in extending EV battery range.

“Nickel is especially important for providing the range that the battery has,” Beischer notes. “Nickel chemistry batteries last longer and therefore can move the vehicle further. It has a higher energy density.”

This becomes particularly important in countries like the United States, where long driving distances and cold weather conditions demand higher-performing batteries.

The Supply Chain Crisis

Perhaps the most alarming revelation from our conversation with Beischer is how vulnerable critical mineral supply chains have become. The United States has effectively surrendered control of these essential resources, while China has strategically secured mineral supplies worldwide.

“The United States has given up its metal supply chains all over the world and furthermore has not done anything to encourage production of metals in its own country,” Beischer explains. “China, I think, had a vision of the future and worked very hard to secure metal supply chains all over the world. In some cases, they have an absolute lock on these supply chains – they control the market.”

This concentration creates dual risks:

  1. National security vulnerabilities: China has demonstrated willingness to weaponize supply chains during trade disagreements, giving them significant leverage.
  2. Environmental concerns: With limited oversight in some producing regions, mining often occurs without the strict environmental standards found in North America.

The Indonesia Example: Clean Energy’s Dirty Secret

The case of nickel mining in Indonesia perfectly illustrates the environmental paradox of “clean” energy. Indonesia has rapidly expanded nickel production with Chinese assistance, but with minimal environmental regulation.

“They’re really running roughshod over the people that live nearby and running roughshod over the environment, not following best practices,” Beischer says. “Furthermore, it’s highly energy-intensive to separate the nickel metal from the ores, and Indonesia makes a lot of its power by burning coal.”

This creates a troubling scenario where electric vehicles marketed as environmental solutions are powered by batteries made with highly carbon-intensive materials.

“It’s completely counterproductive for us to be using nickel metal batteries in electric vehicles to prevent carbon dioxide going in the air when the source of the metal is refining using highly carbon-intensive methods,” Beischer points out.

The Scale of Demand

Most consumers don’t grasp the sheer quantity of minerals required for the green transition. By 2030 – just five years away – global nickel production will need to triple to meet demand from electric vehicles alone.

Even more staggering, Beischer notes: “For copper, if we are to truly electrify our society, we’re going to have to mine more copper in the next 20 to 30 years than has ever been mined in the history of Earth.”

This creates a fundamental challenge: even if the United States wanted to source all critical minerals from countries with free trade agreements, the supply simply wouldn’t be sufficient.

The North American Solution

Companies like Alaska Energy Metals are working to develop domestic mineral resources that meet strict environmental standards. Unlike operations in less regulated regions, North American mines follow robust environmental protocols.

“Our deposit is in the United States, and so we follow American environmental laws and regulations, which are strict. Metals produced here are responsibly produced, protective of the environment,” Beischer explains.

But Alaska Energy Metals is exploring an even more innovative approach: using mining waste streams for carbon sequestration.

“The type of rock that hosts our deposit reacts spontaneously with the air. The magnesium – these are high magnesium content rocks – spontaneously reacts with carbon dioxide in the air to form magnesium carbonate, thereby locking that carbon dioxide into the rock,” Beischer describes.

This could potentially transform mining operations from environmental liabilities into climate solutions – capturing carbon while producing the minerals needed for clean energy.

The Path Forward

Creating truly sustainable critical mineral supply chains requires addressing several challenges:

  1. Increased domestic production: Developing more mineral resources in countries with strong environmental regulations
  2. Global standards enforcement: Demanding responsible mining practices from all producing regions
  3. Consumer awareness: Helping buyers understand the upstream environmental impacts of “clean” products
  4. Supply chain transparency: Creating systems that verify minerals come from responsible sources

The future of clean energy depends not just on new technologies but on securing the fundamental building blocks in ways that align with our environmental goals.

As Beischer reminds us: “If it can’t be grown, then it must be mined. When you think about it, literally everything around you came out of the ground, but people don’t really realize it.”

Key Takeaways

  • Critical minerals like nickel and cobalt are essential for EV batteries and energy storage
  • China controls much of the global supply chain, creating security risks
  • Current mining practices in some regions are environmentally destructive
  • The scale of mineral demand for clean energy is massive and growing
  • North American mining follows stricter environmental standards
  • Innovative approaches like carbon sequestration could make mining more sustainable

Want to learn more about the critical minerals behind the green revolution? Visit Alaska Energy Metals at alaskaenergymetals.com.

Subscribe to GreenTech Pulse wherever you get your podcasts to stay informed about the latest innovations in sustainable technology.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *